Mike Ruppert’s Book: Crossing the Rubicon

Crossing the Rubicon

	recommend book⇒Crossing the Rubicon: 9/11 and the Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil
	by	Michael C. Ruppert	978-0-86571-540-0	paperback
	birth	1951 age: 61	978-1-4176-6684-3	hardcover
	publisher	New Society Publishers	978-1-55092-318-6	eBook
	published	2004-10	B005V63YGK	kindle
Ruppert is an ex-Cop. He builds a solid case that Dick Cheney is the mastermind behind 9/11. See page 280 for a Mike Ruppert’s detailed analysis of why he too thinks Wellstone was murdered.
abe books anz abe books.co.uk amazon.cn amazon.co.uk abe books.de abe books.ca amazon.de amazon.ca amazon.es Chapters Indigo iberlibro.com abe books.com abe books.fr amazon.com amazon.fr Barnes & Noble abe books.it Google play amazon.it O’Reilly Safari junglee.com Powells Kobo Sony eBooks other stores
Greyed out stores probably do not have the item in stock. Try looking for it with a bookfinder.

This is a detective story that gets to the innermost core of the 9/11 attacks. It places 9/11 at the center of a desperate new America, created by specific, named individuals in preparation for Peak Oil: an economic crisis like nothing the world has ever seen.

The attacks of 2001-09-11 were accomplished through an amazing orchestration of logistics and personnel. Crossing the Rubicon discovers and identifies the key suspects and persons of interest — finding some of them in the highest echelons of American government — by showing how they acted in concert to guarantee that the attacks occurred and produced the desired result.

The book makes five key points:

1. Ruppert names Vice President Richard Cheney as the prime suspect in the mass murders of 9/11 and establishes that, not only was he a planner in the attacks, but also that on the day of the attacks he was running a completely separate Command, Control and Communications system which was superseding any orders being issued by the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), the Pentagon, or the White House Situation Room;
2. Ruppert establishes conclusively that in 2001-05, by presidential order, Richard Cheney was put in direct command and control of all wargame and field exercise training and scheduling through several agencies, especially FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). This also extended to all of the conflicting and overlapping NORAD (North American Aerospace Defence Command) drills — some involving hijack simulations — taking place on that day.
3. Ruppert also demonstrates that the TRIPOD II exercise being set up on Sept. 10th in Manhattan was directly connected to Cheney’s role in the above.
4. Ruppert also proves conclusively that a number of public officials, at the national and New York City levels, including then-Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, were aware that flight 175 was en route to lower Manhattan for 20 minutes and did nothing to order the evacuation of, or warn the occupants of the South Tower. One military officer was forced to leave his post in the middle of the attacks and place a private call to his brother — who worked at the WTC (World Trade Centre) — warning him to get out. That was because no other part of the system was taking action.
5. Ruppert also shows that the Israeli and British governments acted as partners with the highest levels of the American government to help in the preparation and, very possibly, the actual execution of the attacks. There is more reason to be afraid of not facing the evidence in this book than of facing what is in it.

	available on the web at:	http://mindprod.com/politics/bush911rubicon.html
	optional Replicator mirror of mindprod.com on local hard disk J:	J:\mindprod\politics\bush911rubicon.html
	Please email your feedback for publication, letters to the editor, errors, omissions, typos, formatting errors, ambiguities, unclear wording, broken/redirected link reports, suggestions to improve this page or comments to Roedy Green : . If you want your message, your name or email kept confidential, not considered for public posting, please explicitly specify that. Unless you state otherwise, I will treat your message as a letter to the editor that I may or may not publish in the feedback section. After that, it will be too late to retract it. If you disagree with something I said, especially when sending an ad-hominem attack, a rant composed mainly of obscenities or a death threat, please quote the offending passage and cite the web page where you found it, tell me why you think it is wrong, and, if possible, provide some supporting evidence. I can’t very well fix erroneous or ambiguous text if I can’t find it.
Blog	Canadian Mind Products IP:[65.110.21.43] Your face IP:[54.235.20.17]
Feedback	You are visitor number 23,490.